Apply the research without turning it into a universal rule.
Nutritional Intelligence interprets defined nutrition contexts through approved TasteFromSoul Research Frameworks and Protocols. Every output shows its evidence boundary and provenance.
Omega-3 evidence changes when the exposure changes.
A bounded interpreter derived from SKP-009. It separates purified prescription EPA, mixed EPA+DHA supplements, fish and seafood, ALA, triglyceride biomarkers, cardiovascular events and atrial-fibrillation safety before translating evidence into decision support.
Read the canonical SKP-009 Research Publication →What omega-3 decision are you actually making?
Choose the closest decision. The interpreter applies the approved SKP-009 Framework and Protocol while preserving formulation, outcome and safety boundaries.
Context Summary
You are considering an ordinary omega-3 supplement for broad cardiovascular prevention rather than a specific prescription treatment context.
Evidence Interpretation
SKP-009 does not support transferring the positive cardiovascular-event result from purified prescription EPA to generic retail fish oil. Major randomized mixed EPA+DHA trials have not shown a consistent reduction in prespecified major cardiovascular-event endpoints across the represented prevention settings.
Confidence & Applicability
High confidence that formulation and prevention context materially constrain interpretation. This does not establish that every mixed EPA+DHA product has no effect on every outcome; it means a general cardiovascular-event prevention claim is not supported by the governed package.
Decision Support
Identify the exact product exposure and the outcome you actually care about before using cardiovascular claims. Do not treat the category label 'omega-3' as enough evidence for general heart-event prevention.
Boundaries & Non-Claims
- • Purified prescription EPA, mixed EPA+DHA supplements, ALA and fish/seafood are not interchangeable evidence objects.
- • Triglyceride lowering is a biomarker effect and does not by itself establish fewer cardiovascular events.
- • Trial dose and formulation are context, not a universal consumer prescription.
- • Prescription therapy, hypertriglyceridemia treatment and medication decisions remain outside this product's authority.
- • This is educational decision support, not diagnosis, treatment or individualized medical advice.
Research Provenance
Creatine becomes useful when the decision is specific.
A bounded interpreter derived from SKP-007. It separates strength, muscle, repeated high-intensity performance, endurance, form choice, loading and safety context before translating evidence into decision support.
Store Alpha is a separate discovery layer. A Store link does not mean the current admitted Store cohort contains the same creatine ProductVersions, and Store placement cannot change Evidence Fit.
What creatine decision are you actually making?
Choose the closest decision. The interpreter applies the approved SKP-007 Framework and Protocol rather than producing a generic supplement answer.
Context Summary
Your target is an incremental strength or muscle-related benefit in a resistance-training context.
Evidence Interpretation
SKP-007 supports creatine as evidence-relevant for maximal strength and lean/fat-free mass alongside resistance training. Direct regional hypertrophy evidence is smaller and less decisive than whole-body lean-mass evidence, so those outcomes should not be treated as interchangeable.
Confidence & Applicability
High confidence for the general incremental maximal-strength and lean-mass direction in represented resistance-training populations; lower certainty for the exact magnitude in an individual and for direct contractile hypertrophy.
Decision Support
Treat creatine as an optional evidence-supported addition to a resistance-training program. Define whether you care primarily about strength, lean mass or direct hypertrophy before judging the result, and do not interpret early body-mass or lean-mass change as pure new muscle tissue.
Boundaries & Non-Claims
- • Creatine does not replace resistance training where the supporting evidence includes resistance training.
- • Lean or fat-free mass is not identical to directly measured contractile-muscle hypertrophy.
- • No universal optimal dose is established by the governed SKP-007 protocol.
- • Cognition is outside SKP-007's governed publication scope and is not inferred here.
- • This is educational decision support, not diagnosis, treatment or individualized medical advice.
Research Provenance
Meal Satiety Context
The first bounded interpreter, derived from SKP-001 Protein & Satiety. It helps separate a useful satiety observation from claims the evidence does not establish.
The Store is for product discovery, not a translation of satiety evidence into product endorsement. Only admitted products appear there, and current Store coverage may not match this decision context.
What are you trying to understand about this meal?
Choose the closest situation. The interpreter applies the approved SKP-001 Protein Satiety Framework and Protocol; it does not use a generic nutrition answer.
Context Summary
The meal is not sustaining satiety for as long as you would like.
Evidence Interpretation
SKP-001 supports treating protein as one meaningful acute satiety input, while also checking fiber, food form, total meal size and the wider meal context. Hunger returning quickly does not identify protein deficiency by itself.
Confidence & Applicability
Moderate overall confidence. The strongest evidence concerns acute subjective fullness and hunger in adults; transfer to your exact meal remains contextual.
Decision Support
Review the meal in this order: identify its meaningful protein source, check whether fiber-rich foods are present, consider whether the food form is easy to consume quickly or weakly satisfying, and check whether the overall meal is simply too small. Change one or two components and compare your repeated hunger/fullness response rather than chasing a fixed protein number.
Boundaries & Non-Claims
- • Acute fullness and hunger are the strongest evidence signals; they do not prove lower total daily energy intake.
- • Protein is one component of meal structure, not a universal appetite switch or guaranteed weight-loss intervention.
- • This is educational decision support, not medical nutrition therapy or individualized clinical advice.
Research Provenance
These modules interpret governed Research in bounded contexts; Product Intelligence can then evaluate observed products without changing the underlying evidence.